|
The practice of marking porcelain with inscriptions and reign marks became increasingly common during the Ming Dynasty. These marks provide valuable information about the dating, provenance, and purpose of specific pieces. Understanding these marks is essential for appreciating the full context of Ming ceramics. They serve as vital pieces of the puzzle for researchers. Reign marks, which typically include the emperor's reign name and the dynasty, were most commonly placed on the base of imperial wares. These marks were usually written in standard Chinese characters (kaishu). The style and placement of these marks can help determine the period of production and often the quality. They can be seen as a kind of timestamp. In addition to reign marks, potters' marks, workshop marks, and inscriptions denoting the use or dedication of a piece can also be found. These inscriptions add depth to the history of the object and offer unique insights into its creation. They offer clues about the people who made them and the patrons who used them. The study of these marks requires a level of familiarity with Chinese calligraphy and the subtle variations that occurred over time. Expertise in this area is crucial for the accurate dating and attribution of Ming pieces. Experts will understand not just the meaning of the marks but also the subtleties of the way they were applied. The marks and inscriptions on Ming porcelain are not merely decorative but rather serve as a record of history. They connect us to the time and place in which these objects were created and also connect us to the people who designed and used them. The continued study of marks and inscriptions is vital for the ongoing research of Ming Dynasty ceramics. They offer key insights that continue to inform our understanding of the production and usage of these pieces. They are a vital part of the historical record. |
Tag : Ming porcelain marks, Reign marks, Chinese inscriptions, Pottery marks, Authentication of Ming
While we have previously covered Longquan kilns, let's focus on the techniques and how they were adapted in Ming Dynasty. Even though the Longquan kilns saw a decline in prominence, the techniques for producing celadon wares were continued and reinterpreted in many Ming Dynasty ceramics. The versatility and elegance of celadon styles meant that they continued to be influential even during this period of stylistic change and innovation.
The Xuande reign (1426-1435) is celebrated for its exceptional blue and white porcelain, characterized by refined cobalt blue glazes, intricate designs, and a peak of technical and artistic sophistication in Ming ceramic production.
While we've touched on the literati, it's worth focusing on the specific influence of figures like Dong Qichang (1555-1636) and other prominent Ming literati on the art of ceramics. These scholars and artists, with their emphasis on refined taste, classical learning, and a connection to the natural world, helped shape the aesthetic sensibilities of late Ming pottery. The influence of these figures helped to shape a new appreciation for subtle beauty and refinement that would become increasingly influential over the course of the Ming period.
While not a direct copying, the visual language of woodblock prints, with their bold lines, repeating patterns, and clear delineation of forms, had a noticeable influence on the decoration of some Ming Dynasty ceramics, particularly in pieces featuring figural or narrative scenes. The influence of other print and image making practices is a key element in understanding the sources of inspiration for Tang period potters.
While we’ve discussed the use of iron oxide, let’s examine the specific level of control that Ming potters achieved over this material. Ming potters gained an incredible amount of control over the use of iron oxide to achieve a variety of colors, tones, and textures in their glazes and underglaze decorations, demonstrating the high level of technical expertise that was common during this period.